Met the New Delhi-based Kashmiri journalist Iftikhar Gilani a month ago. Gilani spent several months in Delhi's Tihar jail in 2002, charged under the Official Secrets Act. What produced these charges is a story in itself. Benighted authorities who raided his house stumbled on documents on his PC on Indian troop deployments in Kashmir, and used that to accuse him of spying for Pakistan. Of being a terrorist.
Never mind that these were publicly available documents that Gilani had downloaded off the Internet, as you can. Never mind that the Director General of Military Intelligence told the Government the documents had "no security value." And anyway, all that's a story for another time.
In January 2003, Gilani was finally released because there was simply no substance in the charges against him. Not even a government venal enough to make empty accusations against the man -- the then BJP-led Indian government, good riddance to that shambling gang -- could find, or manufacture, evidence to substantiate their charges.
But if his release told us some things, Gilani's experience in jail told us some others. In interviews (one's here, don't miss learning why the Bible is popular in Tihar), he described how he was beaten and abused by fellow prisoners, because they saw him as a terrorist. A traitor.
He was denounced as a traitor, that is, by criminals. One of his attackers is serving a 80 year sentence for three murders, if you please.
Something about a murderous criminal calling someone else a traitor and a terrorist -- quite apart from Gilani's innocence -- strikes me as perverse. You?
Well, you say, but that's just thugs in Tihar. But consider that we are surrounded by leaders who have multiple cases against them for everything from murder to rape to cheating to rioting; who have been named in innumerable inquiries for their parts in some of our country's darkest moments of terror. In other words, we are surrounded by leaders who in every way, except a presence behind bars, are indistinguishable from Gilani's once-compatriots in Tihar jail.
Yet these leaders regularly trumpet their own patriotism, pronounce that others are traitorous, even lead us in saluting that proudly fluttering symbol of patriotism, the Indian tricolour. Now if an inmate of Tihar did those things, we would scoff at the scoundrel. But somehow we are willing to swallow it all from other scoundrels who are just as venal, but who have turned to politics, and patriotism, instead. Their sure route to evading justice, of course. Their last refuge, naturally.
And so when I think about Iftikhar Gilani, two things come to mind. First, I can't decide which is worse. His treatment by murderers in jail? Or his treatment by the vile government that sent him there?
Or maybe I can decide which is worse. I have decided.
Second, all this is why patriotism turns my stomach. I'm obsessed with it, but it turns my stomach.
November 02, 2004
Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)
Very nice post. Or rather, very well written. The incident is sickening.
I enjoyed your post because I have been saying the same thing for years. But isn't it true that the people are at fault for this? For putting these politicians back in power? I don't live in India, so may be you could offer a better answer than I could. When I was in India though, my father was put in Tihar jail on false charges also. Although my dad was only in there for thirty days, it took about 10 years for the accuser (a Delhi judge) to drop the charges and free him from the stigma. Our system is in chaos and we need to fix it.
Completely agree, but don't we deserve the leaders we get? Nice to lament, for instance, about the electorate's choice in the Maharashtra elections: a corrupt criminal gang vs a corrupt criminal communal gang, but what do any of us do about it? Why doesn't any one from the middle class try to form a clean group and stand for elections -- difficult but the attempt is worth it.
And the judicial system sucks. Takes aeons to decide any case. I know a friend who once caught a thief in his prawn farm and handed him over to the cops -- for the last six years, he has been summoned to the court (he has to drop everything and be there or he faces contempt of court) while the accused runs free. Given the relative opportunity costs, one wonders who is getting penalised.
A very well written post. I agree with your views. I slightly differ from your views that only the government is to blame. While it needs to share the blam, a society that cares two hoots for the rights of an individual has to share a much larger slice. The government IS a democratically elected government, so we've put them there. Well put it this way, its more sickening.
Post a Comment