June 28, 2007

Same blood

Aisam-ul-Haq Qureshi, I read somewhere, has been writing a line in his diary every day of 2007. That line reads: "I will qualify for Wimbledon."

And this Pakistani tennis player did just that: played through the forgotten tennis backwaters that are the "qualies", and made it to the main draw of Wimbledon. Then on Tuesday, he won his first round match in the main draw, a straight-sets walk in the park against Lee Childs. His reward for that feat? A second-round match against the Russian tennis maestro and maverick, double grand-slam winner and once world #1, Marat Safin.

Whatever Qureshi does against Safin, he will be remembered. Though not for his first round win, nor for qualifying for Wimbledon. Nor even for his superb win two weeks ago at the grasscourt warmup tournament in Halle, against the up-and-coming Frenchman Richard Gasquet.

No, many who love this game remember Qureshi instead for what he did four years ago: he played doubles at that year's Wimbledon. His partner? Amir Hadad. From Israel.

Should it have been a surprise that this got Qureshi into plenty of trouble at home in Pakistan? The sports establishment there worked itself into a tizzy of harrumphing, flinging about words like "ban" and "this is wrong" and "he will not be allowed to play Davis Cup for Pakistan".

To his credit, Qureshi was entirely unfazed by all this. Here's some of what he said in reaction:

"I am surprised at the fuss being made over my partnership ... If we can change people's minds then that would be a good thing. ... If we win here then I would dedicate the victory to my family and to peace. It would be good for those doubters to see that even though we are from different religions it is possible for us to work together and have some fun. A Jew and a Muslim playing together is not the end of the world. We are all human beings. We have the same blood, the same skin."

Indeed. And I have to wonder, what if Qureshi teamed up with our own doubles maestro, Mahesh Bhupathi, to play the next Grand Slam and more? How much harrumphing would there be on two sides of a border?

Yet what kind of a signal would it send out on both sides of that border?

Good speed to you, Aisam-ul-Haq Qureshi. You'll need it in your match against one of the tennis geniuses of our time, Safin. But really, I don't care what happens in that match. As they say: You're already a winner.

8 comments:

Prasoon said...

Just one word - beautiful !!

Anonymous said...

Indians and Pakistanis have played together in the past also...going far back, the short-lived Rest of World v/s Australia series in was played in the midst of India-Pakistan tensions, even through the war. I think Gavaskar discusses the amicable relationship between the Indians and Pakistanis in general in the midst of what must have been a very testing time in his autobiography. Certainly, I remember Gavaskar stating how Inthikab Alam would be handed chits by some Australia-based Pakistani (in a restaurant, I think) giving the progress of the war (or whatever) and how "Inti" would crush the chits and throw them away without looking at them. (Good to know that Inti's liberalism - not sufficiently appreciated in India, I think - has more-or-less remained with him...I think he was (still is?) the coach of the (Indian) Punjab cricket team a couple of years back.)

While it is good to have such relationships, there is no point in overstating their importance. First, most Pakistanis (like Indians) don't particularly care - the noise, as usual, is being made by a small number of idiots. Second, and you might want to address this, why don't we hear of such noises from Israel, though there is no shortage of idiots there either?

Suresh

Anonymous said...

Sorry for the follow-up but just wanted to mention that the Rest of the World v/s Australia was in 1971-72. If you are interested, you can catch a brief glimpse of one of the highlights of that series: Sobers' 254 which Don Bradman described as the best ever innings played in Australia over here:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4SzfWtTZOtA

And just heard that Sania Mirza is partnering Israel's Shahar Peer in the ladies doubles at Wimbledon. Hope no idiot makes anything of it.

S.

Pavitra said...

Why does DD think if the Pakistani player and Mahesh Bhupath turn up for doubles ,there would be uproar on BOTH sides of the border?Is he being deliberatly 'naughtly' just to show Indians are as bad as the Pakis.Here is my tak on what would happen:
1.99 percent of Indians won't care.
2.The useful idiots like DD and the media will jump up haling the new turn in the relationship of the neighbours.Lot of discussions in NDTV and IBN will be conducted.
3.Nothing will change at the ground level.

Dilip D'Souza said...

Suresh, thanks for the RoW/Aus reminder (what a fine clip of Sobers, incidentally). Inti was indeed the coach of Punjab, as recently as last year if I'm not mistaken. It's a good question, why not noise from Israel? I'm going to have to think about that one.

And I'm following the Mirza/Peer pairing. Hope they go far.

pavitra: why would there not be uproar? We are, after all, the country that has dug up pitches and vandalized cricket board offices and trophies just because Pakistan was scheduled to come play matches in India. Seems like a solid enough history to base future predictions on.

Pavitra said...

"the country that has dug up pitches and vandalized cricket board offices and trophies just because Pakistan was scheduled to come play matches in India"

Typical DD speak.These incidents took place when a lot of Indians were(and still are) getting killed as a result of the paki policy.The protesters have never said that we should not play the Pakis just because they are Pakis or Muslims.You may not agree with their methods but I do not see any falsehood in their cause.But for DD,Hindi-paki equal equal.I do not expect you to understand the difference or even if you do,acknowledge it.We still do not prevent our people from visiting Pakiland nor have we stopped playing the Pakis anywhere.

Dilip D'Souza said...

The protesters have never said that we should not play the Pakis just because they are Pakis...

I see. So exactly why did they not want us to play the Pakistani team?

nor have we stopped playing the Pakis anywhere.

Oct 1991: Pakistan cricket team scheduled to tour. Wankhede stadium dug up. Pakistan team tour cancelled.

Pavitra said...

"I see. So exactly why did they not want us to play the Pakistani team?"

DD,I have already stated that they were protesting the paki policy of killing Indians.Is it so difficult to understand?Or are u pretending not to understand the obvious?